Your architecture isn’t failing because of tools.

It’s failing because of ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜€.

How often does the following occur?

โ€ข Beautiful diagrams nobody uses
โ€ข Standards nobody follows
โ€ข Roadmaps collecting digital dust

It doesnโ€™t matter how big you are or how small, you can have any number of the following:

โ€ข Enterprise architects
โ€ข Solution architects
โ€ข Technical architects

But if they aren’t talking to each other and working towards a common direction:

โ€ข Architecture stops being a ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป and becomes a ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜…
โ€ข Common knowledge becomes ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ป
โ€ข Roadmaps become ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ with the wheel being ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ over and over
โ€ข No one takes ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† for the overarching control of the organisation’s offerings

So, how do you flip the script?:

โ€ข ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ด๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฟ architecture forums
โ€ข The top of the tech tree ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ธ๐˜€ to all the branches
โ€ข ๐—–๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜€-๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น reviews
โ€ข Shared solution ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝ

Architecture Management provides an understanding of the elements and interrelationships that allow the organisation to achieve objectives and deliver value.

Get it right and you will:

โ€ข Deliver ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ
โ€ข Make ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ that stick
โ€ข Make ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜‚๐—ฒ flow

It’s not about ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—น๐˜€, it’s about ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜.

Is your approach to Architecture Management bringing people together or forcing them apart?